Hi Raul,

I think you suggested it in another place and I replaced it where I
shouldn`t have.

Cheers,

Mike

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Removing 0 = was my suggestion.  I've not taken the time yet to see
> why this was a bug, but I apologize.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Michal D. <michal.dobrog...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Linda, you are a bug finding machine!  c11 is simpler than the
> original
> > and is more correct than the latest version I put up on pastebin.  I
> > introduced a bug by removing the 0= from this although I shouldn't have.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Linda Alvord <lindaalv...@verizon.net
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Next, isn't c1 the same as c11?
> >>
> >> I make silly little scripts like this and I run them in a new Jconsole
> and
> >> then do T '' lots of times until I'm pretty sure they agree.
> >>
> >> T=: 3 : 0
> >> n=:1+?6
> >> d=:1+?6
> >> ]D=:(n%2) > (?]) n$d
> >> ]E=:?(n,d)$2
> >> ]c1=:0= ? A=:(2$d)$(>. d%2)
> >> ]c11=:?(d,d)$2
> >> F=:($D)-:$E
> >> G=:($c1)-:$c11
> >> F,G
> >> )
> >>
> >> T ''
> >>
> >>
> >> Linda
> >>
> >> -----Original Mesesageh
> >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftrware.com] On Behalf Of Linda
> >> Alvord
> >> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 5:12 AM
> >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
> >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Arc consistency in J
> >>
> >> I just began to ponder this thread. Do you think E is the same as D?
> >> th
> >> D=. (n%2) > (?]) n$d
> >> E=. ?(n,d)$2
> >>
> >> Linda
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
> >> [mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> D.
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 11:26 PM
> >> To: programm...@jsoftware.com
> >> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Arc consistency in J
> >>
> >> > >> variables.  In other words, if we specify the constraint x < y it
> >> > >> looks like either x1 < x2 or x2 < x1 is sufficient to satisfy arc
> >> > >> consistency.  In other words, i think we should always use the
> >> > >> symmetric closure of the constraint.
> >> > >
> >> > >> Does this sound valid to you?
> >> > >
> >> > > Unfortunately not.  There are no values that can satisfy x1<x2 and
> >> x2<x1.
> >> > > If this was the case all csps would have no solutions
> >> >
> >> > I meant x1<x2 OR x2<x1
> >> >
> >> > So symmetric closure was the wrong term for me to use.
> >> >
> >> > But I think we want to be using intersection of the relationship with
> >> > its inverse.
> >> >
> >> > Does that sound right to you?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sorry I missed the or.  Unfortunately not, I mean you can have a
> constraint
> >> like that if you want but you don't have to have to in general.  I think
> >> we're dwelling on an implementation detail.  They (wikipedia) must just
> >> have
> >> the < constraint propagating both ways.
> >>
> >> My brain is fried but I did hack together an ugly search procedure.  You
> >> can
> >> try it out on a sudoku puzzle if you want.  For some reason I couldn't
> >> generate it using the code you gave me.  http://pastebin.com/2zPB4DBA
> >>
> >> Maybe we can update the printf docs to say:
> >> load 'format/printf'
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/jforc/input_and_output.htm
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Mike
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to