Yes, my english description was wrong (sorry about that, and thanks to Brian Schott for pointing this out to me).
I should have said: node 0 is connected to node 1 and node 2 nodes 1 and 2 are each connected to node 3. Thanks, -- Raul On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:08 AM, David Ward Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > Note 'Raul means this network' > O--/\/\--1 > | | > / / > \ \ > / / > \ \ > | | > 2--/\/\--3 > > 0 1 1 _ > 1 0 _ 1 > 1 _ 0 1 > _ 1 1 0 > ) > > > parallel =: +/&.:% > series =: +/ > > parallel~ 1x > 1r2 > > parallel~@:series~ 1 > 1 > >> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:36:27 -0500 >> From: Raul Miller <[email protected]> >> To: Programming forum <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Jprogramming] xkcd 356 >> Message-ID: >> <CAD2jOU9pz7EGL-tYtk+uPhceKvvdUdu6f=r > [email protected]> > > addendum: > > 1x (series parallel series) 1x > 1 > > (1x series 1x) parallel (1x series 1x) > 1 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
