On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote:
>    f
> ] ; [: |: u@v d._2 _1 0 1 2
>
>    g
> ] ; [: |: (0 0 0 0 1r24&p. , 0 0 0 1r6&p. , -:@*: , [ , 1"0)"0
>
> Can you write and explicit version that will produce the tacit version of  g
> ?

What does this question mean?

Are you concerned with the results of g and want g itself to be
explicit? Or are you only interested in its structure (which is
tacit)? If the latter what is it that you want to be explicit, and
why?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to