The smallest departure from existing rules might be (name =:"0 value)
On Jan 21, 2013 8:24 AM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Still... I sometimes wonder if perhaps we ought to introduce a new
> grammatical production so that (name 0=: value) was equivalent to
> (name =: value"0). Or maybe that would be cleaner if it were phrased
> as (name ("0)=: value)?
>
> ...
> Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
