Could we call it J kernel then? Personally I like the name and it would
also not conflict with J core as defined by the Dictionary.


On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:43 PM, km <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here's a shot at specifying a J core by deleting things from the
> Vocabulary page.
>
> Here are some of my opinions:
>
> > =  • Equal      =. Is (Local)   =: Is (Global)
> > < Box • Less Than       <. Floor • Lesser Of (Min)      <: Decrement •
> Less Or Equal
> >> Open • Larger Than    >. Ceiling • Larger of (Max)    >: Increment •
> Larger Or Equal
>
> Core J does not need decrement, nor increment - you can use -&1 or +&1
>
> > _ Negative Sign / Infinity      _. Indeterminate        _: Infinity
>
> Core J does not need indeterminate, nor should it need constant
> functions.  You can use constant"_ for example.
>
> > + Conjugate • Plus      +. Real / Imaginary • GCD (Or)  +: Double •
> Not-Or
>
> Core J should probably ignore complex numbers (this also discards some
> later verbs).  They are useful but not that useful.  Double and Not-Or
> can also be ignored.  I'd also discard boolean operations.
>
> > * Signum • Times        *. Length/Angle • LCM (And)     *: Square •
> Not-And
>
> The only core element on this line is, I think: Times
>
> > - Negate • Minus        -. Not • Less   -: Halve • Match
>
> I'd ignore Halve.
>
> > % Reciprocal • Divide
> > %: Square Root • Root
>
> I'd ignore %:
>
> > ^ Exponential • Power   ^. Natural Log • Logarithm      ^: Power (u^:n
> u^:v)
> > $ Shape Of • Shape
> > $: Self-Reference
>
> I'd ignore ^. and $:
>
> > ~ Reflex • Passive / Evoke      ~. Nub •        ~: Nub Sieve • Not-Equal
>
> I'd ignore nub sieve and evoke.
>
> > | Magnitude • Residue   |. Reverse • Rotate (Shift)
> ...
> > : Explicit / Monad-Dyad
> > :: Adverse
>
> I'd ignore Adverse (it's rarely used, and for good reason)
>
> > , Ravel • Append        ,. Ravel Items • Stitch ,: Itemize • Laminate
> > ; Raze • Link
> > ;: Words
> >
> > # Tally • Copy
> >
> > ! Factorial
> > !: Foreign
> > / Insert • Table
> > /:  • Sort
> > \ Prefix
> > \:  • Sort
> >
> > [ Same • Left           [: Cap
> > ] Same • Right
> > {  • From       {. Head • Take  {: Tail •
> > }  • Amend (m} u})      }. Behead • Drop        }: Curtail •
> >
> > " Rank (m"n u"n)        ". Do •         ": Default Format • Format
> >
> >
> > @ Atop  @. Agenda       @: At
> > & Bond / Compose        &. &.: Under (Dual)     &: Appose
>
> I'd ignore &.: and @: and &: - they are convenient but unnecessary.
> Similarly, I'd ignore {: and }: - we are trying to give the beginner a
> simpler to learn vocabulary.
>
> u@v is equivalent to u@(v"_) for example.
>
> > ? Roll • Deal   ?. Roll • Deal (fixed seed)
>
> I'd ignore ?.
>
> > a. Alphabet     a: Ace (Boxed Empty)
> > b. Boolean / Basic
>
> I'd ignore b.
>
> > e.  • Member (In)
> > E. • Member of Interval
> >
> > i. Integers • Index Of  i: Steps • Index Of Last        I. Indices •
> Interval Index
> > j. Imaginary • Complex
>
> I'd ignore i: and j.
>
> > NB. Comment
>
> I'd also be hard pressed to find an application which used all of
> these, which was suitable as an illustration for beginners.
>
> That said, rather than trying to define a comprehensive "core
> vocabulary" I'd be interested in a concept like "J material for
> beginners should begin with a vocabulary pertinent to that essay".
>
> FYI,
>
> --
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to