Ok, saying "any" was my bad. But I want to convey that
for me this relatedness -- the primitive set as a family --
is more important than my getting to type just 1 token
instead of 2. I hope that a winning 1-token-command
design will do utmost to emulate -- change, perhaps,
but not dilute or trade off -- such organization.
William Tanksley, Jr wrote:
PMA<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, if the relatedness within each primitive set gets lost,
won't a need for 3-to-6 times the number of J primitives
virtually cancel any one-token-per-command advantage?
No, it won't cancel "any" (by which I mean "all") of the advantage.
But yes, it will lose SOME. It's a tradeoff.
...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
