Skip >This is what your line becomes after being filtered by an ascii editor (my >main editor):
×÷=%_$~<>??¦??????¤«»¡¿ in the email source everything was binary (binHex`d) encoded. >If such is required for intelligent communication of J i personally do not >want to take that step. >At this point in the language J`s evolution i would like to see it solidified >... in as many platforms as possible. That requires stability not >fragmentation in the base graphical structure. >i _would_ however like to see innovation _inspired_ by J. That _could_ be the >design of a language which does take advantage of modern possibilities. >Coming to mind is a 1.5 (like TeX) or 2D language (not successfully built >yet). J has some interesting constructs in its syntax. Those might see a true >flowering into a higher graphical level. Higher dimensionality would make it very easy to consider more than two input streams. What are those possibilities, and how can they be generated syntactically? >i would hope that this concentration of energy we have here can be really used >for the next language (L?) greg ~krsnadas.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
