I see what you mean.  It's not so much that "."0 and ,.&.": display as
hooks.  I believe what you are expressing is that the display may be more
understandable (more beautiful, etc.) if it were more symmetric.  The
current display opts for minimizing the number of rows.

Current:
       ┌─ ,.
── &. ─┴─ ":

Symmetric:
       ┌─ ,.
── &. ─┤
       └─ ":

Current display of +/ % #, in contrast:
  ┌─ / ─── +
──┼─ %
  └─ #





On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]>wrote:

>    h=:  "."0@":
>    i=: 13 :' ("."0)":y'
>    (h-:i) 314159
> 1
>
>    5!:4 <'h'
>             ┌─ ".
>       ┌─ " ─┴─ 0
> ── @ ─┴─ ":
>
>    5!:4 <'i'
>   ┌─ [:
>   │     ┌─ ".
> ──┼─ " ─┴─ 0
>   └─ ":
>
>
> What if  (“.”0)  and  (,.&.”:)   and were displayed as forks rather than
> hooks.  Many complex sentences will not “unlock” with a display of the
> function:
>
>     f
> ,.&.":
>    h
> "."0@":
>
> So I use  5!:4 very often. I guess of they looked more like forks I would
> get steered in the right direction in the dictionary faster.  I guess it is
> sort of personal preference.
>
> Linda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:30 AM
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Base/antibase question
>
> What is the new trick?
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > It would be nice for  5!:4 to learn a new trick.
> >
> >     fc
> >    g=: 13 :'".,.":y'
> >    5!:4 <'f'
> >        ┌─ ,.
> > ── &. ─┴─ ":
> >
> >    5!:4 <'g'
> >   ┌─ [:
> >   ├─ ".
> > ──┤    ┌─ [:
> >   └────┼─ ,.
> >        └─ ":
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to