I am a terrible programmer, but I have found that including comments that have 
examples of what the entity should do, are usually enough for me to figure out 
what is going on. 

Without that ... I usually start from scratch, as that is faster and less 
frustrating. 

I really am terrible at programming.

Cheers, bob


On May 15, 2014, at 10:52 PM, 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> "how does one write understandable J?" One does not write understandable J! 
> One writes as compactly as possible, and if it needs to be understood it's 
> parts are investigated piece by piece. Understandability is not a property of 
> text, but rather a property of relationship between text and reader. / Bo.
> 
> Den 3:51 fredag den 16. maj 2014 skrev Don Guinn <[email protected]>:
> 
> What is easy and obvious depends so much on one's background. Several years
>> ago we tried to teach a woman, at the time in her 80's, how to use a
>> Windows computer. Total failure. The real problem was that she could see no
>> use in or reason to use a computer. She had no interest in learning it.
>> 
>> Anyone who thinks that today's computer technology is intuitive, obvious
>> and easy should go to an old folk's home and try to teach them to use a
>> smart phone. But for a four-year-old. Piece of cake.
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I am convinced that most code is not understandable to most people,
>>> regardless of the language it is written in. When I look at how the
>>> computer industry has progressed, I see this more and more. People write
>>> huge amounts of code, don't document it very well, then other people use
>>> arbitrary bits of it and things sort of just freeze at that point.
>>> 
>>> Personally, also, when I read code in any language, I do not feel I really
>>> understand it until I see what it does to representative data.
>>> 
>>> So clear descriptions, simple data, and good labels are where I would focus
>>> most of my efforts in making code readable. And I would also expect that
>>> most of my code is going to be unread by most people (and I'll get dinged
>>> for utterly random stuff by people who do read it).
>>> 
>>> I think the point of readability is: you are going to need to be able to
>>> fix it, yourself, when it breaks, so you need to make it readable for
>>> yourself. And for that purpose, coming back and trying to read it a month
>>> or so after you've written it can be a good exercise.
>>> 
>>> Also, I've found that documenting code is a great way of making code
>>> simpler. It's quite often the case that it's easier to change the code to
>>> be easy to document than it is to document some coding quirks that
>>> originally seemed to be a good idea. So if you want readable code, another
>>> good thing to do is have a technical writer (or at least someone reasonably
>>> literate) work with the programmer to document it for some audience.
>>> 
>>> Of course, the most important thing is making sure that it works.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Raul
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Kip Murray <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> How does one write understandable J?  I offer my newt adverb below which
>>>> uses spaces to promote understandability.
>>>> 
>>>> Another technique might be Linda's "bottom up" style of first showing
>>>> pieces then putting the pieces together.  What are your techniques?
>>>   Please
>>>> illustrate.
>>>> 
>>>> We would like at least to understand our own code when we come back to
>>> it!
>>>> 
>>>>     NB. Newton's method
>>>> 
>>>>     newt =: 1 : 0
>>>> t =. y
>>>> h =. 1 % 512
>>>> whilst. t ~: s do.
>>>>     s =. t
>>>>     t =. s - +: h * (u s) % (u s + h) - u s - h
>>>>     h =. h % 2
>>>> end.
>>>> t
>>>> )
>>>>     (2 - *:) newt 2   NB. Find root of 2 - *: near 2
>>>> 1.41421
>>>>     (2 - *:) newt _2  NB. Find a root near _2
>>>> _1.41421
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> 
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to