The reason I use _ as a placeholder for missing data is there could be 0 as
an authentic value.

sent from an android phone
2014. 6. 28. 오전 2:27에 "'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming" <
[email protected]>님이 작성:

> an approach I would take: (untested)
>
> 'p1 p2 p3 p4' =: i.4
>
> (make numeric 'row column value' data) 4 : 'for_i x do. y=. v (<r;c) }  y
> [''r c v''=. i end. y' 15 4 $ 0
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: June Kim (김창준) <[email protected]>
> To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:16:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Filling in Tables
>
> Hello Dan,
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > June Kim asked:
> > > Is there an easier way to do the following? My first attempt was:
> > >    'day id val'=:|:(<a:;0 2)(".&.>@{`[`])} data
> > >    coord=:(<"1 day ,. (i.~ ~.) id)
> > >    load 'strings'
> > >    ysize=:>:>./day
> > >    (a:, <"1 ~.id), (<"0 i.ysize),.((<_);<a:) rplc~"1
> > >    <"0 val coord} _$~ysize,#~.id
> >
> > Part of the complexity you're wrestling with arises from your
> construction
> > of a boxed table with column headers and row labels.  Do you really need
> >
>
> I added the headers and labels at the end of the computation.
>
> that? Typically, that's only useful when you've done all your analysis and
> > computation and want to present a formatted result for human consumption.
> >
>
> I had to move the result to a spreadsheet program(in my case, Excel and
> google spreadsheet) to create a chart. They had to be in a boxed matrix,
> and then it could be easily transformed into a formatted string.
>
>
> > If "data" represents your input, to which you want to apply some
> analysis,
> >
>
> Yes, they are.
>
>
> > it would be simpler, easier, and faster to work with a pure (unboxed)
> > numeric matrix of values, then slap the headers on when you're done.
> >
> >
> I wonder how your approach would be different. Could you please show me how
> you'd like to go about it with a pure matrix of values?
>
>
> > If you really need the formatted boxed table, then using amend, as you
> do,
> > is the most common and straightforward approach. I can't really recommend
> > many improvements, except perhaps to construct the body of the table
> > directly, and skip the "rplc" part.  For example:
> >
> >            coord2tab =: verb define
> >                 'x id d'=.<"1 |: y
> >
> >                 my =. >./ y =. id i.~ uid =. ~.id
> >                 mx =. >./ x =.  0 ". ;:^:_1 x
> >
> >                 t  =. d (x ;&.> y)} (1 + mx,my) $ a:
> >                 (a: , <"0 i. 1+mx) ,. uid , t
> >         )
> >
> >
> Thank you for your idea. Now I see why rplc was redundant.
>
>
> >
> >            data=: TAB cut&> LF cut noun define-.' '
> >                  0      p1       4
> >                  2      p1       6
> >                  3      p1      10
> >                 13      p1      15
> >                  0      p2       3
> >                  1      p2       5
> >                  7      p2      10
> >                 10      p2      11
> >                 14      p2      12
> >                  1      p3       9
> >                  5      p3      10
> >                  9      p3      20
> >                  7      p4      10
> >         )
> >
> >
> >            coord2tab data
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |  |p1|p2|p3|p4|
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |0 |4 |3 |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |1 |  |5 |9 |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |2 |6 |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |3 |10|  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |4 |  |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |5 |  |  |10|  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |6 |  |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |7 |  |10|  |10|
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |8 |  |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |9 |  |  |20|  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |10|  |11|  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |11|  |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |12|  |  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |13|15|  |  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >         |14|  |12|  |  |
> >         +--+--+--+--+--+
> >
> > But as I said, this is fundamentally the same approach, with minor
> > simplification and some reformatting of the code.
> >
> > -Dan
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to