That's the idea - we have to break this down to its primitive
constitutents: where "primitive" explicitly means that numerical values
can only be combined with - + * % and | .  So yes, we'd have to use your
named hornersRule or some named equivalent in place of  p.  . If we permit
p., we might as well permit #. and t. and so on .. all the way back up to 
^  .



----- Original Message ---------------

Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Power for the powerless
   From: David Lambert <[email protected]>
   Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:52:07 -0400
     To: [email protected]

Restricting against p. is too much constraint.  p. *must* be implemented 
with Horner's rule.
If not,

hornersRule =: [: +`*/ [: }. [: , ,.~
assert (-.+:8?@#0) (hornersRule -: p.) 3

> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:49:40 -0400
> From: Dan Bron<[email protected]>
> To:[email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Power for the powerless
> Message-ID: <PC1993201408050949400080597fc8b8@DNYCW000013>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Raul wrote:
>> >   A really simple approach would be to use T.
>> >     pow=: ^ T. 99
> First: probably a better name for your function is "exp" instead of "pow"
> ("exp" is a monad related to the dyad "pow" by fixing its left argument to
> 1x1).
>
> But certainly exp is a welcome improvement over my formulation, with a
> couple caveats. Specifically, even if we write off the presence of the
> primitive ^ in ^T.99 as permissible due to the use-mention distinction,
> the result of T., as you point out:
>
>> >  gives you a polynomial expression
> i.e., is an expression involving p., which is not one of the specifically
> enumerated operations. More problematic, it has an implicit use of ^ (the
> DoJ explicitly defines x p. y  as  +/x*y^i.#x).  This is why I explicitly
> excluded T.'s

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to