This a way to produce numbers using the Knuth up arrow notation in J:

   Knuth=. &* NB. (adv)
   up=. &1    NB. (adv)

   2x  Knuth up up    4 5
65536
2003529930406846464979072351560255750447825475569751419265016973710894059556311453089506130880933348101038234342907263181822949382118812668869506364761547029165041871916351587966347219442930927982084309104855990570159318959639524863372367203002916969...

   # @: ": 2x Knuth up up 5
19729

   6x Knuth up up 3
2659119772153226779682489404387918594905342200269924300660432789497073559873882909121342292906175583032440682826506723425601635775590279389642612611093020398930347774460613894425379600874662147884229022133853819192905427915750759274952935109319020362271989...
   #@: ": 6x Knuth up up 3
36306

   3x Knuth up up up 0 1 2
1 3 7625597484987

2x Knuth up up 6  NB. It is toooooooooooo big!

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Fausto Saporito <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> yes the number is very big, but why if I don't use the extended
> precision I have "infinity" as result, and if I use it I got an error
> ?
>
> I should get infinity anyways.
>
> this is my J session:
>
> ^/ 2 2 2 2
>
> 65536
>
> ^/ 2 2 2 2 2      NB. do not use extended precision and I have "+inf"
>
> _
>
> ^/ 2 2 2 2 2 2   NB. do not use extended precision and I have "+inf"
>
> _
>
> ^/ x: 2 2 2 2 2   NB. using extended precision I have the result (part of
> it)
>
>
> 2003529930406846464979072351560255750447825475569751419265016973710894059556311453089506130880933348101038234342907263181822949382118812668869506364761547029165041871916351587966347219442930927982084309104855990570159318959639524863372367203002916969592156...
>
> ^/ x: 2 2 2 2 2 2 NB. using extended precision I have error... not "+inf"
>
> |limit error
>
> | ^/x:2 2 2 2 2 2
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knuth%27s_up-arrow_notation
>
> thanks,
> Fausto
>
> 2015-02-17 18:55 GMT+01:00 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> <[email protected]>:
> >   2 ^. ^/ 5 # 2x
> > 65536
> >
> > so at just 5, it is a 65k bit number
> >
> > at 6, the 2log of that number would be that 65kbit number.  The number
> of atoms in the universe is an 80 bit number.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Fwd: Hello all!
> >
> > I would guess that the number you are generating is too big to be
> > represented using J's data structures (which would also suggest that
> > it would be too big to fit into memory).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Fausto Saporito
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> HI!
> >>
> >> I'm a new J user with a little experience of APL and LISP.
> >>
> >> In these days I'm playing with big numbers... very big indeed, and I
> >> found a bug (?) in the exteded precision implementation of J.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if I can call it a bug, but if I use the standard
> >> precision number I got a "infinity" as result... as should be.
> >>
> >> I'm talking about knuth-up-arrow notation, to build the "tower of
> >> power". In J the syntax is amazingly simple : ^/ 2 2 2 2
> >>
> >> 2^^4 is 2 * (2* (2* 2)) = 65536
> >>
> >> Now 2^^5 is _ with standard precision... but if I use x:  (i.e. ^/ x:
> >> 2 2 2 2 2) can get most of number... it's quite big indeed.
> >>
> >> The problem arises with 2^^6 or 3^^4 I get "limit error" instead of _
> ... why ?
> >>
> >> Is it an expected behaviour ?
> >>
> >> thanks in advance,
> >> Fausto
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to