Thanks, Raul.
Yes, I think that's right. I'd deliberately chosen non-complementary
colours for diagonally opposite corners to show that they didn't need
to be complementary, at the cost of needing to specify a few more
colours.
If complementarity is required, since the corners A B C D in my labelling
are opposite to G H E F respectively, we may relax the requirement for
mycube's right argument to have 8 elements. with, for example:
'A B C D H G F E' =. 8 {. y, -.1 0 3 2 { y
You can then specify just
30 mycube BLACK,BLUE,CYAN,GREEN
to achieve the results same results.
I think
5 mycube RED,MAGENTA,WHITE,:YELLOW
produces most of what Linda achieves in her latest posting,
although I concede it doesn't have sticky tabs.
I had used the apparently strange ordering of A B C D H G F E because
these labels line up reasonably well in the net that Linda uses, so that
the top three middle faces are labelled 4 2$ 'HGEFABCD' . It might have
been easier to visualise if I'd labelled "BACK" as ABCD and "FRONT" as
HGEF....
Thanks again,
Mike
Mike set things up so we can change the colors on the line which invokes mycube.
I think
30 mycube BLACK,BLUE,CYAN,GREEN,YELLOW,WHITE,MAGENTA,:RED
gets it right. Does that seem right to you?
I've changed the gist to use that line.
Thanks,
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
