row=:_2[\,&,

would have been more concise? Or is that too silly?

-- 
Raul

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote:
> And another version:
>
>   row=: _2&([\)@,&,
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The straightforward version:
>>
>>    row =. ,&(,:^:(2 > #@$))
>>
>> The shorter but ugly (and slower) version:
>>
>>    row =. ;@,&:(<@,:"1)
>>
>> The beautiful but slowest version:
>>
>>    row =. ,&.:(<"1)
>>
>> Henry Rich
>>
>> On 7/18/2015 8:04 PM, Kip Murray wrote:
>>
>>>     1 2 row 3 4
>>>   1 2
>>>   3 4
>>>      1 2 row 3 4 row 5 6
>>>   1 2
>>>   3 4
>>>   5 6
>>>      (1 2 row 3 4) row 5 6
>>>   1 2
>>>   3 4
>>>   5 6
>>>      (1 2 row 3 4) row 5 6 row 7 8
>>>   1
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to