This one's the winner. On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> row=:_2[\,&, > > would have been more concise? Or is that too silly? > > -- > Raul > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> > wrote: > > And another version: > > > > row=: _2&([\)@,&, > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> The straightforward version: > >> > >> row =. ,&(,:^:(2 > #@$)) > >> > >> The shorter but ugly (and slower) version: > >> > >> row =. ;@,&:(<@,:"1) > >> > >> The beautiful but slowest version: > >> > >> row =. ,&.:(<"1) > >> > >> Henry Rich > >> > >> On 7/18/2015 8:04 PM, Kip Murray wrote: > >> > >>> 1 2 row 3 4 > >>> 1 2 > >>> 3 4 > >>> 1 2 row 3 4 row 5 6 > >>> 1 2 > >>> 3 4 > >>> 5 6 > >>> (1 2 row 3 4) row 5 6 > >>> 1 2 > >>> 3 4 > >>> 5 6 > >>> (1 2 row 3 4) row 5 6 row 7 8 > >>> 1 > >>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
