I expect you'll get many of the same response. Your conjunction is fine, however this particular case is so frequent there's a built in conjunction. Read "but first",
    x f&g y
or
    x f&:g y
the difference being rank.  Add but first square:

      4 +&: *: 5
41


On 12/03/2015 10:05 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 03:05:50 +0000
From: Lippu Esa<[email protected]>
To:"[email protected]"  <[email protected]>
Subject: [Jprogramming] My first J conjuction
Message-ID: <4C1D3F3685BCAE4699AA47F9961903BA33126CC3@VDOMES02>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello everybody,

I realized with some shame that I haven't written a single J conjunction - 
ever. Some adverbs, yes, but they too are newish.

I have a recurring need for sentences like (f x) g f y where verb f is applied 
to nouns x and y and dyadic verb g is then applied to the two results.

and was thinking of something like x f c g y with c being a conjuction. This is 
what was the result:

fxgfy=: 2 : 0
:
(v x) u v y
)

4 + fxgfy *: 5 NB. very simple example

    4 + fxgfy *: 5
41

Is there a more natural J way to do this? What would be a good name for this 
type of conjunction or operation?

Esa

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to