> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Rich
> Sent: vrijdag 4 december 2015 11:11
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] My first J conjuction
>
> Kip's version doesn't refer to x or y directly. This is an important
> improvement.
Why?
R.E. Boss
> The body of Kip's conjunction is executed BEFORE the x and
> y arguments are seen:
>
> of =: 2 : 'v@[ u v@]'
> + of *:
> *:@[ + *:@]
>
> This is not true of the original form:
>
> fxgfy=: 2 : 0
> :
> (v x) u v y
> )
> + fxgfy *:
> + (2 : (':'; '(v x)u v y')) *:
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 12/4/2015 1:19 AM, Kip Murray wrote:
> > And you can use a fork in the definition of a conjunction:
> >
> > of =: 2 : 'v@[ u v@]'
> > 4 + of *: 5
> > 41
> >
> > On Thursday, December 3, 2015, Kip Murray <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> A fork is not a conjunction but it shows what you are doing:
> >>
> >>
> >> 4 (*:@[ + *:@]) 5
> >> 41
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
