Regarding the first release of Jx see [0].
Personally, regardless of the availability of Jx, as I said, I prefer in
this kind of case, an adverb using strand notation, and one should be able
to produce it using an official J (Pascal might give it a try);
furthermore, one should also be able to produce the equivalent of the
adverb lambda which I have found to be quite handy. (I just do not have a
reason to try).
[0] [Jprogramming] J Extensions
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2014-March/035925.html
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jose Mario Quintana
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I would rather use strand notation (a multiple adverb). Using Jx and the
> > adverb lambda mentioned in [0] is straightforward:
>
> Personally, I don't even remember where to download Jx - nor do I know
> where to find docs on how it differs from the official implementation,
> nor do I know what naming scheme to use in the OS to keep it (and its
> versions) straight with the official versions.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
