Raul writes: " Also straightforward would be this adverb.
lambda= 3 : " lambda = 3 : |value error: lambda | lambda=3 : Did you mean the following? lambda=. 3 : If so, sf=. [: u0 u1 u2 (u0@[ u1 u2@]) lambda |domain error: lambda | sf=.[:u0 u1 u2 (u0@[u1 u2@])lambda I am afraid our understandings of "equivalent" are somewhat different. (I would move this to chat but I do not subscribe to that forum.) On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Jose Mario Quintana < jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > Regarding the first release of Jx see [0]. > > Personally, regardless of the availability of Jx, as I said, I prefer in > this kind of case, an adverb using strand notation, and one should be able > to produce it using an official J (Pascal might give it a try); > furthermore, one should also be able to produce the equivalent of the > adverb lambda which I have found to be quite handy. (I just do not have a > reason to try). > > [0] [Jprogramming] J Extensions > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2014-March/035925.html > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jose Mario Quintana >> <jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I would rather use strand notation (a multiple adverb). Using Jx and >> the >> > adverb lambda mentioned in [0] is straightforward: >> >> Personally, I don't even remember where to download Jx - nor do I know >> where to find docs on how it differs from the official implementation, >> nor do I know what naming scheme to use in the OS to keep it (and its >> versions) straight with the official versions. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Raul >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jose Mario Quintana < jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would rather use strand notation (a multiple adverb). Using Jx and the > adverb lambda mentioned in [0] is straightforward: > > sf=. [: u0 u1 u2 (u0@[ u1 u2@]) lambda > +: + -:sf > +:@[ + -:@] > > 3 4 +: + -:sf 2 4 > 7 10 > > type'sf' > ┌──────┐ > │adverb│ > └──────┘ > > [0] [Jprogramming] Can whatever be written tacitly? > > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2015-February/041130.html > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
