Yes. Looks like I was wrong (or, at least, suspicious of the wrong thing.)

Thanks,

-- 
Raul


On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:08 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think there are already enough evidences to call for
> further investigation to prove or disprove the bug.
>
> Чт, 17 дек 2015, Raul Miller написал(а):
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:40 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > ?.  2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
>> > 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
>> > 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 
>> > 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 8 9 6 8 14 7 12 9 1 15 2 15 3 13 3
>> >
>> > ?. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
>> > 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
>> > 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 
>> > 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
>> >
>> >
>> > one less leading 2 in first example.  47 leading 2s, correct result.  48 
>> > leading 2s and everything is 2.
>>
>> So?
>>
>> Consider this:
>>
>>    ?.4#4
>> 2 0 0 2
>>    4{.?.400#4
>> 2 0 2 0
>>
>> The size of the right argument influences the values generated at each 
>> position.
>>
>> You would need to perform a large number of experiments to show a
>> statistical flaw in the results.
>>
>> --
>> Raul
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to