I think this bug is serious. If anyone can provide a patch
based on the j701 GPL source and related test script,
then I can merge the fix into the next release.
 
Чт, 17 дек 2015, Henry Rich написал(а):
> ? (32$2) , 32 $ 1000
> 
> 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
> 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
> 
> 
> The chance of getting that with no bug is about 1 in 10^86. There's a bug.
> 
> 
> The question is, Why can't we just fix it?  If I wanted to put in the
> change, how would I do so and get the change into a release?
> 
> 
> We have a bug list of 50 or so errors, some serious.  If this language is
> going to live, it needs to be able to grow.
> 
> 
> Henry Rich
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/17/2015 9:08 PM, bill lam wrote:
> >I think there are already enough evidences to call for
> >further investigation to prove or disprove the bug.
> >
> >Чт, 17 дек 2015, Raul Miller написал(а):
> >>On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:40 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> >><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>?.  2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
> >>>2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
> >>>0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 
> >>>1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 8 9 6 8 14 7 12 9 1 15 2 15 3 13 3
> >>>
> >>>?. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 
> >>>2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
> >>>0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 
> >>>0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>one less leading 2 in first example.  47 leading 2s, correct result.  48 
> >>>leading 2s and everything is 2.
> >>So?
> >>
> >>Consider this:
> >>
> >>    ?.4#4
> >>2 0 0 2
> >>    4{.?.400#4
> >>2 0 2 0
> >>
> >>The size of the right argument influences the values generated at each 
> >>position.
> >>
> >>You would need to perform a large number of experiments to show a
> >>statistical flaw in the results.
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Raul
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to