I should probably think up names for the components of that tacit verb, and break it up into pieces that way. (Probably approximately but not exactly on the parenthesis boundaries).
However, I do not know enough about the problem domain to come up with decent names. Still, that can be a worthwhile exercise, if you feel like attempting it. Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Skip Cave <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow! Great answers. I didn't think this could be done without control > statements. By now I should know that J's powerful set of primitives can > implement most any algorithm without requiring looping statements. > > Mike Day's sharp eye spotted the fact that my data was derived from an > infix sliding-window boxing of an unboxed vector. Mike's step-by-step set > of verb definitions helped greatly in understanding what was going on. > > Raul's monster tacit verb is probably the most complex tacit expression I > have ever tried to analyze. His de-construction of the verb helped in my > understanding, but my tacit skills are still a way from being able to > create something like this on my own. Hopefully, my study of this function > will improve my tacit skills. > > Thanks for all your help, > > Skip > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
