What do you mean by "empty path" and what does that have to do with nesting?
Thanks, -- Raul On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doesn't the path system give you all the nesting capability you need? > > I don't think it's possible to have no current/implied locale. I have > wanted that on occasion & never figured out a way to achieve it. You > certainly can have an empty path. > > Henry Rich > > On 4/7/2017 7:22 AM, Raul Miller wrote: >> >> If we *do* change that, then perhaps we should also be thinking about >> being able to nest locales (much like K's namespaces), also. >> >> The current flat arrangement is based on this rationale which we are >> now questioning. >> >> Put differently: we should not simply change how things work without >> thinking through the implications of that change. >> >> (We will also need a way of determining the locale of an anonymous >> verb, for example. Also: would it be possible to have a locale-free >> verb? If not, what are the implications of that?) >> >> Thanks, >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
