nest locale is interesting. I think J can implement it by changing parser/tokenizer to recognize name_a$b$c_ as name in locale c within locale b which is inside locale a. a is in copath of a$b which is in copath of a$b$c.
Пт, 07 апр 2017, Raul Miller написал(а): > If we *do* change that, then perhaps we should also be thinking about > being able to nest locales (much like K's namespaces), also. > > The current flat arrangement is based on this rationale which we are > now questioning. > > Put differently: we should not simply change how things work without > thinking through the implications of that change. > > (We will also need a way of determining the locale of an anonymous > verb, for example. Also: would it be possible to have a locale-free > verb? If not, what are the implications of that?) > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Currently, yes. But the question is whether we should change that. > > > > Henry Rich > > > > On 4/6/2017 4:41 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > >> > >> Anonymous verbs do not *have* a locale. Locale is an aspect of names > >> and how things are named. > >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
