+"0/~ i.3
0 1 2
1 2 3
2 3 4
+"_1/~ i.3
0 2 4
+"0 b.0
0 0 0
+"_1 b.0
_ _ _
I understand that this is dictionary compliant:
"In general, each cell of x is applied to the entire of y . Thus x u/ y is
equivalent to x u"(lu,_) y where lu is the left rank of u ."
+"_1 b.0
_ _ _
So u"_1/ -: u"_ _ . Wouldn’t it be better though if u"_1/ -: u"_1 _ ,
or if (u”_1 b.0) -: _1 _1 _1 (or any other negative rank)?
I ran into this while trying to use ,"_1/ , which I can replace by >@{@,&< ,
but I still find this strange.
Louis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
