You'll avoid using this, but it's there if you really need it for
something special? /Erling
On 2017-10-08 16:54, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
I messed up the last part of my last message. It should have been:
You can get what you want using instead,
(".@:('p'"_) , 0 $ 'p' =:: ]) 'erling'
erling
p
erling
erase'p'
1
or
(".@:('p'"_) , 0 $ 'p' =.. ]) 'erling'
erling
p
erling
since =.. is easier to type and it is equivalent to =:: unless =.. is used
within an explicit environment (beware of the standard library verb load).
I hope it helps,
PS. Personally, I do not rely on the actual sequential execution of the
tines of forks because I dream of the day when j/jx can execute them in
parallel.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Jose Mario Quintana <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Erling,
This might be repetitive because I have not read carefully the responses
to your question.
Allow me to try to illustrate the issue using =:: first. The Jx verb =::
can be modeled using the explicit,
cop=. '(x)=: y'(dyad :)
The sentence,
(p , 0 $ 'p' =:: ]) 'erling'
|value error: p
| (p,0$'p'=::])'erling'
|[-4]
fails for the same reason, whatever it is, that the sentence,
(p , 0 $ 'p' cop ]) 'erling'
|value error: p
| (p,0$'p'cop])'erling'
|[-1]
fails.
You can get what you want using instead,
(".@:('p'"_) , 0 $ 'p' cop ]) 'erling'
erling
p
erling
or
erase'p'
1
(".@:('p'"_) , 0 $ 'p' =:: ]) 'erling'
erling
p
erling
since =.. is easier to type and it is equivalent to =:: unless =.. is used
within an explicit environment (beware of the standard library verb load).
I hope it helps,
PS. Personally, I do not rely on the actual current sequential execution
of the tines of forks because I dream of the day when j/jx can execute them
in parallel.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]
wrote:
I also remember it as extremely nice and friendly a long time ago. /Erling
On 2017-10-08 16:19, Roger Hui wrote:
Many people here have a habit of giving long lectures to people about
things they already know to make it appear like they are totally stupid
and they themselves are very clever and are teaching this stupid person
even the most basic things. /Erling
At 2004-10-21 09:44:37 -0400, Eric Iverson sent a message to the J Forum
(
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2004-October/018558.html)
which
included the following sentence:
The J Forum was a particular joy for Ken [Iverson]. He was an avid reader
and was amazed and pleased with the civility.
I would like to see continuation of this civility, and posters avoid
name-calling and other negative insinuations. The J Forum and J
community
are an amazing resource and the civility is a main reason for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
