No, that's true for C but not for J.
Since (v1 a) may produce an array, the interpreter cannot assume that v1
need not be evaluated.
Henry Rich
On 11/6/2017 5:52 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
Hello,
when I have
(v1 a) *. (0 <: a=. v2 42)
where v1 and v2 are some verbs, isn't it
so that when a<0 the (v1 a) part is not evaluated?
Thanks
Ruda
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
