also "a" need not be a scalar, it may be an array. Пн, 06 ноя 2017, Henry Rich написал(а): > You might wonder, "Can't there be a special case to handle this for > conditionals?" so that > > if. (expression that fails if a<0) *. (a>:0) do. > > wouldn't fail. But no: the first expression must be evaluated to see what > part of speech it is: > > +: (@:) *. a >: 0 > > is something completely different. > > The language would need new control words to allow incomplete evaluation. I > have added a request for them to > http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Interpreter/Requests > > Henry Rich > > On 11/6/2017 6:55 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: > > On 6 November 2017 at 12:49, Linda Alvord <lindaalvor...@outlook.com> wrote: > > > *. Times any number wil be 0. > > > > > > (b=:>:a) *. (0<a=._5) > > > 0 > > > b > > > _4 > > > 23*.0 > > > 0 > > Yes, right you are! > > Sorry for the noise, it gets always evaluated. > > I just got puzzled a bit. Now it's fine again. > > > > Thanks to R. Miller, too. > > Sorry again. > > > > Ruda > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > http://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
-- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
