More details at http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/EmptyArguments
I consider the treatment of empties to be as fixed as anything in J. Its omission from the Dictionary is just an omission.
Henry Rich On 12/13/2017 12:22 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
The issue you discovered here is also discussed at http://www.jsoftware.com/help/jforc/empty_operands.htm Properly speaking, it's an implementation issue rather than a dictionary issue (and, thus, subject to change, given sufficient motivation - but need a really good reason before making these kinds of changes, of course). Thanks,
--- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
