We will get to it when there is enough critical material. We aren't there
yet.

For now, the community gets far more bang for our buck with effort on NuVoc
and the wiki.

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any plans for updating the Dictionary?
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > More details at
> >
> > http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/EmptyArguments
> >
> > I consider the treatment of empties to be as fixed as anything in J.  Its
> > omission from the Dictionary is just an omission.
> >
> > Henry Rich
> >
> > On 12/13/2017 12:22 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> >
> >> The issue you discovered here is also discussed at
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/jforc/empty_operands.htm
> >>
> >> Properly speaking, it's an implementation issue rather than a
> >> dictionary issue (and, thus, subject to change, given sufficient
> >> motivation - but need a really good reason before making these kinds
> >> of changes, of course).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > http://www.avg.com
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to