Raul, I think I would have stopped with this part of your explanation. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But keep in mind that the verb (]\) has two definitions: a monadic > definition and a dyadic definition. So you should expect a different > result from (3 ]\ i.4) than what you get from (]\ i.4)
When you speak of monadic verbs modified by dyadic adverbs it seems a bit confusing, although I do understand your reasoning. Cheers, bob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
