I think I would have stopped with this part of your explanation. 
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 11:47 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But keep in mind that the verb (]\) has two definitions: a monadic
> definition and a dyadic definition. So you should expect a different
> result from (3 ]\ i.4) than what you get from (]\ i.4)

When you speak of monadic verbs modified by dyadic adverbs it seems a bit 
confusing, although I do understand your reasoning.

Cheers, bob

For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to