It seems like the problem is that Catalogue manadic rank is one. I really
can't see much use in passing it a table or higher rank of boxes. So what
about changing its monadic rank to infinite? It seems to me that that would
open up interesting possibilities, including as Henry wanted it to work in
the first place. As of now the things being built restricted to numbers or
letters. It would not affect anyone using it with a list of boxes as it
would still work the same.

Is there any way to determine the rational for its monadic rank being one?

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:12 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> No.  But no argument for doing so either.  Thus, I will not complicate
> the code with the special case.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 7/23/2018 9:39 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Any reason to not make the L.0 case for { use the <“1 implementation?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > —
> > Raul
> >
> > On Sunday, July 22, 2018, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'll get the answer to this one right.  <"r is heavily optimized.  Don't
> >> try to replace it.
> >>
> >> Henry Rich
> >>
> >> On 7/22/2018 7:08 PM, Don Guinn wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes. The documentation describes exactly what's happening. The rank 1
> is
> >>> the key making each number an item. In this case it is the equivalent
> to
> >>> (<"1) by itself. So, is it a good idea to use ({) in place of (<"1)
> when
> >>> wanting to box something rank 1? It's shorter and simpler to read. But
> >>> what
> >>> about optimization? It seems to me that it would be a neat example in
> >>> NuVoc.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 4:42 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Henry Rich wrote:
> >>>>> As I read Ye Dic, ({ i. 2 4) should give the same result as
> >>>>> ({ <"1 i. 2 3).
> >>>>>
> >>>> I never thought I'd have to say this to *you* but:
> >>>> note that Catalogue { has rank 1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hence there should not be any interaction between the colors in
> >>>>
> >>>>      { 'black' ,: 'green'
> >>>>
> >>>> nor in the low / high vectors in
> >>>>
> >>>>      { i. 2 4
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> To me, Catalogue { works just fine as-is.  In particular, the DoJ
> >>>> also covers the "open argument" case as it stands.
> >>>>
> >>>>      { 'black'            NB. the same as:   { 'b' ; 'l' ; 'a' ; 'c'
> ; 'k'
> >>>> +-----+
> >>>> |black|
> >>>> +-----+
> >>>>
> >>>> Quote:
> >>>>
> >>>>           {y forms a catalogue from the atoms of its argument, its
> shape
> >>>>           being the chain of the shapes of the opened items of y . The
> >>>>           common shape of the boxed results is $y .
> >>>>
> >>>>                                                           Martin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [PS 1:  the empty shape of the resulting box
> >>>>
> >>>>      $ { 'black'
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> happens to be a concatenation ("chain") of the five empty letter
> shapes
> >>>> here.
> >>>>
> >>>> PS 2:  Those reading down to here may also be interested in this
> >>>> short exercise:
> >>>>
> >>>>           What's the result of
> >>>>           { 'ht' ; 'ao' ; ,. 'gtw'
> >>>>           ?
> >>>>
> >>>> (Just follow the instructions above :-)
> >>>> ]
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> >> https://www.avg.com
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to