Can you be more specific? I don’t remember the dictionary making this assertion.
I am also wondering why you would want a different concept of gerund for @. and ^: (or, generally speaking, why you would want a different array type for different positions in a parsed verb). Thanks, — Raul On Tuesday, September 4, 2018, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > That's not Dictionary behavior, though. It shouldn't. > > Henry Rich > > On 9/4/2018 9:42 AM, Raul Miller wrote: > >> @. also accepts the ARs of non-verbs. >> >> For example: >> >> V=:p:i.9 >> (+/%#)`(<(,'0');V)@.0 V >> 11.1111 >> >> Thanks, >> >> > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
