As I recall, Ye Dic says that gerunds are created by the tie
conjunction, and ipso facto are verbs or nouns. Every mention of the
use of a gerund implicitly assumes that an evoked atom of a gerund is a
verb.
m in [email protected] and n in u^:n, if gerunds, are the same type as far as I am
concerned. I don't understand your last sentence (specifically what you
mean by 'array type', which to me is
literal/boolean.../verb/adverb/conjunction; and what 'positions of a
parsed verb' are).
Henry Rich
On 9/4/2018 10:31 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
Can you be more specific?
I don’t remember the dictionary making this assertion.
I am also wondering why you would want a different concept of gerund for @.
and ^: (or, generally speaking, why you would want a different array type
for different positions in a parsed verb).
Thanks,
—
Raul
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
That's not Dictionary behavior, though. It shouldn't.
Henry Rich
On 9/4/2018 9:42 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
@. also accepts the ARs of non-verbs.
For example:
V=:p:i.9
(+/%#)`(<(,'0');V)@.0 V
11.1111
Thanks,
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
