Raul and I are, or at least I am, reading "[email protected] is a verb defined by the gerund m" (see my previous post reproduced below).
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Please tell me what I wrote that you disagree with. I have no idea what > you're reading. > > Henry Rich > > On 9/6/2018 11:20 AM, Raul Miller wrote: > >> Are we reading the same text? >> >> "[email protected] is a verb..." >> >> What is going on here? >> >> Thanks, >> >> > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > From: Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:34 AM Again, I also interpret the Dictionary's text the same way as you do; that is, the m, in the entry for [email protected], is referred as "the gerund m" and I disagree with Henry's assertion "By my reading, such an m is not a gerund." The verb producing sentence, (;:'+/')@.0 1 +/ is also sanctioned by the Dictionary as far as I can see. Perhaps is worth noticing that ((<,'+') ` (<,'/')) -: (;:'+/') 1 and (<,'+') and (<,'/') are, respectively, the atomic representations of the verb + and the adverb /. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
