-:`+^:_1 i.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
it applies the first verb. ignoring 2nd, and if there are more length error. Hard to see usefulness, and if there was some, v0`v1`...vn^:n should behave like v0^:n Though, I'm fine with error. ________________________________ From: Henry Rich <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] What does gerund^:n do? +`*`- i.5 is simply an execution of dyad i., looking up 5 in the boxed list. +`*:^:_1 i.5 0 1 2 3 4 seems to result in y gerund not length 2 is a length error? other n seem to be domain errors including 0 Now you're getting warm. The first statement is false, the other two are true. Henry Rich On 11/17/2018 11:04 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming wrote: > first there is > > +`- i.5 > 2 > +`*`- i.5 > 3 > > seems like the number of items in gerund is the result no matter what? > > > +`*:^:_1 i.5 > 0 1 2 3 4 > > seems to result in y > > gerund not length 2 is a length error? > > other n seem to be domain errors including 0 > > I'm ok with making this an error, rather than "improving" functionality to do > something "powerful" > > ________________________________ > From: Henry Rich <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 10:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] What does gerund^:n do? > > > > No. All I see are domain errors when you try gerund^:n . The question > is, For what values of gerund and n does gerund^:n not fail, and what > does it do then? > > (I already know the answer because I'm looking at the source code, > wondering whether this is functionality we ought to keep) > > Henry Rich > > > On 11/17/2018 10:35 AM, Brian Schott wrote: >> Does this shed any light? >> >> gerund =. +`- >> gerund/ i. 10 >> 9 >> gerund/ i. 11 >> _1 >> gerund^: i. 11 >> |domain error >> | gerund ^:i.11 >> gerund^:3 i. 11 >> |domain error >> | gerund ^:3 i.11 >> gerund^:3] i. 11 >> |domain error >> | gerund ^:3]i.11 >> vgerund =. - >> vgerund^:3] i. 11 >> 0 _1 _2 _3 _4 _5 _6 _7 _8 _9 _10 >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 10:20 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> (Actually, I know the answer to this, but I can't find it in the >>> documents anywhere & I wonder why it's supported). >>> >>> For certain gerunds and certain n, >>> >>> gerund^:n >>> >>> does not produce an error. What does it do? >>> >>> Henry Rich >>> >>> --- >>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. >>> https://www.avg.com >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
