It seems to be just academic now. Nevertheless, does your interpretation imply that,
5" 5" is not "reduced" but, 5} 5} is "reduced" in the context of shift-reduce parsers? On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:53 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > What Ken meant by "resolve" is not clear to me. > > I expect he meant what people working with shift-reduce parsers would > call "reduce". (But Ken would not be inclined to call it that, I > imagine, because reduce was a similar/different well defined APL > operation.) > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
