Why? Can you elaborate? On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:07 AM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. > > Thanks, > > — > Raul > > > On Tuesday, December 11, 2018, Jose Mario Quintana < > jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It seems to be just academic now. Nevertheless, does your interpretation > > imply that, > > > > 5" > > 5" > > > > is not "reduced" but, > > > > 5} > > 5} > > > > is "reduced" in the context of shift-reduce parsers? > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:53 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > What Ken meant by "resolve" is not clear to me. > > > > > > I expect he meant what people working with shift-reduce parsers would > > > call "reduce". (But Ken would not be inclined to call it that, I > > > imagine, because reduce was a similar/different well defined APL > > > operation.) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Raul > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
