Nope, I am the propagation issue. It has been made public now and should be accessible.
Cheers, bob > On Jun 3, 2019, at 10:08 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > I get "This video is unavailable." when I try to watch this one. > > Probably it takes time for videos to propagate to edge servers? > > I'll try again tomorrow... > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:34 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hey Brian, >> >> Based on your thoughts on the backgrounds I redid the video for Head so that >> the representation of the atom becomes a solid blue background instead of >> ring when it is made into a one item list. >> >> Hopefully this consistency will help the understanding as we move forward. >> >> The new video is posted here. https://youtu.be/FV9G5zeRnPg >> >> Cheers, bob >> >>> On Jun 2, 2019, at 8:45 AM, 'robert therriault' via Programming >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Brian, that is great feedback. >>> >>> It was the true intent and you are right that I should mention it. >>> >>> Also, the reason that the atom example has only a blue border is that the >>> shape of an atom is empty, whereas the solid blue indicate the shape of the >>> items. The blue border differentiates it from the list of length 1 which >>> would be a solid blue background. The challenge that I face is that I don't >>> want to get too far into the weeds when I am explaining something like >>> Behead. That was one of the reasons that I made up an Items video, as it >>> explains the concepts that are foundational to the explanation of verbs >>> that operate on items. >>> >>> Your third point is actually why I included the empty examples. Often they >>> are mentioned only in passing, when I think that the difference between >>> items that are empty and no items is a foundational concept. If your >>> confusion is a result of not being clear on the distinction, then I am okay >>> with that if it leads to understanding. If the presentation confuses the >>> issue further, then I have work to do. I am going to take another look at >>> that at those empty examples. I did think about the further explanation of >>> i. 0 2 and i. 2 0, but again that would bring a whole other verb into the >>> discussion and I thought it better to just have s20 and s02 be what they >>> are because I don't think for these purposes that it matters how they came >>> to be that way. >>> >>> Just my thoughts. Any responses/disagreements would be welcome, as that is >>> how these videos will improve. >>> >>> The nice thing about making these videos into labs is that I can address >>> some of this in the examples and the text surrounding the video. I hope to >>> have the Behead lab up later today and I will certainly think about your >>> points as I develop it. Of course, if the confusion is deep enough then the >>> solution is to redo the video! >>> >>> Cheers, bob >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 2, 2019, at 8:21 AM, Brian Schott <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Bob, >>>> >>>> I think I noticed a pattern where each "item" in each example has a >>>> separate blue background. >>>> If that is the true intent, >>>> a) you might mention it >>>> b) in the first "atom" example, the item has a blue border, only. >>>> c) I get a little confused after that with s20 and s02, maybe because I >>>> have difficulty understanding the difference between empty items and >>>> non-existent items. It's especially important for the backgrounds and >>>> borders to be consistent. (It might even be helpful to make clear that s20 >>>> and s02 are i. 2 0 and i. 0 2, if that is correct.) >>>> >>>> Very nice examples. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 5:43 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just posted a new video on the Behead Monadic Verb. It is along the >>>>> lines of the last one (Head Monadic Verb) and I will be putting up some >>>>> labs pased on it in the next day or two. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions and/or comments are welcome. >>>>> >>>>> https://youtu.be/7T53JdaE0HY >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, bob >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> (B=) <-----my sig >>>> Brian Schott >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
