No, &: works properly. That note is just saying that monadic &: may not
be as fast as monadic @: because some special forms containing @: are
not recognized for &: .
You are using &: dyadically. You ended up executing
0 (1&Z: ] ]) 1
but 0 (1&Z:) 1 executes 1&Z: 0 times (see
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/ampm)
Henry Rich
On 1/16/2020 11:50 AM, 'Sergey Kamenev' via Programming wrote:
The bugs are yours.
Thank you!
In your second bug, you are not executing 1&Z: . You should have @:
not &: .
Does &: not work because of this?
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/ampco
The monadic use of &: is deprecated. Use @: instead.
Some compounds of the form f&:g are not recognized for special code in
places where f@:g is recognized,
if only the monadic form of the compounds is eligible for special
treatment.
Sergey
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
