0j19":4.34+.4.44 0.0200000000000466471 4.57+.0.0200000000000466471 5.39568e_12 9!:19]1e_11
+./4.57 4.34 4.44 0.01 On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:20 AM 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming < programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote: > The expression > 4.57+.(4.34+.4.44) > > > should evaluate like this > 4.34+.4.44 > 0.02 > > 4.57+.0.02 > 0.01 > > > > but it does evaluate to > 5.39568e_12 > > > which is a useless and incorrect result. > = is tolerant, why isn't +. ? > Thanks. > Bo. Den fredag den 15. maj 2020 16.24.10 CEST skrev Henry Rich < > henryhr...@gmail.com>: > > What's wrong with it? > > 0j19 ": 4.57 4.34 4.44 > 4.5700000000000002842 4.3399999999999998579 4.4400000000000003908 > > Henry Rich > > On 5/15/2020 10:17 AM, 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming wrote: > > +./4.57 4.34 4.44 > > 5.39568e_12 > > > > NB. this was not the correct answer. A bug? > > > > +./x:4.57 4.34 4.44 > > > > 1r100 > > > > NB. this was a work-around > > Thanks! > > Bo. > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA Quantitative Consultant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
