Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/commits/master might interest you...

Indeed, I have the repo cloned locally!

However, when digging through old bug reports, I find it quite challenging to
match up the "fixed" notices with the corresponding code commits. In cases with
a clear test case demonstrating the bug, we can use git-bisect to sleuth out
the commit that eliminates the failure. However, cases without this almost
invariably defeat my investigative skills.

For posterity's sake, and if it's not too much of a hassle, I thought it might
be helpful to have some commits/diffs/comments attached to those "fixed"
messages.

I will admit to a bit of an ulterior motive here, though.

Bill, Eric, and Henry have deep domain knowledge about JE. I am personally
hoping that sharing the diffs would also spark discussion and give a natural
avenue to share and spread such expertise.

The gory details are exceptionally interesting!


Permit me to query a broader point, though.

It strikes me that the git-shortlog on the repo is very short:

    $ git shortlog --summary
    6   Chris Burke
    231 Eric Iverson
    1430        HenryHRich
    1   bill
    597 bill lam
    3   cdb
    3   kbi

For the most part, we only have 3 devs, with all of them part of the old guard,
per se. Better yet, Henry has authored over 62% of all commits! Granted, this
only reflects the history from 2016 onward, but my question is this: Do we have
up and coming JE hackers that can pick up the torch when the time comes?


Anyway, maybe JSoftware has a vision for the future that I've failed to pick up
on. The ulterior motive behind my "share a bit about the fix" is to perhaps
open a channel with the community that sucks in potential JE devs like myself!
I was just trying to be sneaky about things by suggesting something very simple
and, hopefully, hassle-free.


2!:55
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to