'May be'. Have you actually implemented it?
I find it very hard to believe that a J sparse array would be the best
choice for any database. It seems to me to:
* take lots of memory per value
* have limited or inefficient queries
* be very slow for updates, as the entire table must be copied
Please prove me wrong.
Henry Rich
On 4/5/2021 10:04 PM, Igor Zhuravlov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021, 11:52 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
I propose that the maximum value for a rank, whether of a verb or a
noun, will be 63. Minimum verb rank will be _63.
You got a problem with that?
A database in J may be implemented as a sparse boolean orthotope where each
axis corresponds to some attribute (field, column of relational table), and
value 1 ("true") marks tuple [1].
A restriction proposed will limit a number of attributes to <64 for this
application. It would be sad but not fatal. I'd prefer to have this limit
larger, say, O(1e5).
References:
[1] http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2000-February/003102.html
Jforum: Sparse Array as Database ?
Roger Hui
Thu Feb 10 19:06:50 HKT 2000
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
