I'm aware of ,: for homogeneous lists =) The main reason I was searching for a 
solution and
eventually found <"0&> was specifically to deal with non-homogeneous lists 
(such as a string
and two lists of numbers), as well as to deal with arbitrary numbers of lists 
easily. The
manual alternative I found and was seeking to optimize was something along the 
lines of this
(potential forks aside):

   (<"0 input) , (<"0 parens input) ,: (<"0 depthOf input)

The dictionary example you linked is quite interesting! The 'table' definition 
in profile
implements something similar which I've used before. I'm guessing it's a more 
recent addition
than that dictionary page?

   */~ table 1+i.5
┌───┬─────────────┐
│*/~│1  2  3  4  5│
├───┼─────────────┤
│1  │1  2  3  4  5│
│2  │2  4  6  8 10│
│3  │3  6  9 12 15│
│4  │4  8 12 16 20│
│5  │5 10 15 20 25│
└───┴─────────────┘

~ Katrina

On 10/15/21 3:32 AM, Elijah Stone wrote:

On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Katrina Scialdone wrote:
     <"0&> input ; (parens input) ; (depthOf input)
NB. you can remove redundancies here using a fork:
<"0&> (] ; parens ; depthOf) input
Its behavior is quite similar to ,[0.5] in Dyalog APL, which was the
inspiration for finding a J equivalent.
If your lists are homogenous, you can use ,: instead:
    x=. i.5
    y=. -x
    z=. *:x
    w=. -:x
    x , y , z ,: w
0   1  2   3  4
0  _1 _2  _3 _4
0   1  4   9 16
0 0.5  1 1.5  2
(Whoever thought the axis operator was a good idea, I have no idea... :)
Is this a known technique, and is there a common name for this?
I don't know of a specific name for it, but using boxes to format tables
is definitely common.
The dictionary uses something similar to demonstrate the 'table' adverb
(https://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/intro03.htm).
  -E
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to