Katrina - this looks like this may be a useful extension of the work done
at the end of this essay: https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Array_Thinking .
Please keep us informed if you extend it further.

Elijah - I suspect Ken may be to blame for the axis specification.  It
would appear that J's rank ideas reflect his more recent thinking on this.



On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:51 AM Katrina Scialdone <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm aware of ,: for homogeneous lists =) The main reason I was searching
> for a solution and
> eventually found <"0&> was specifically to deal with non-homogeneous lists
> (such as a string
> and two lists of numbers), as well as to deal with arbitrary numbers of
> lists easily. The
> manual alternative I found and was seeking to optimize was something along
> the lines of this
> (potential forks aside):
>
>     (<"0 input) , (<"0 parens input) ,: (<"0 depthOf input)
>
> The dictionary example you linked is quite interesting! The 'table'
> definition in profile
> implements something similar which I've used before. I'm guessing it's a
> more recent addition
> than that dictionary page?
>
>     */~ table 1+i.5
> ┌───┬─────────────┐
> │*/~│1  2  3  4  5│
> ├───┼─────────────┤
> │1  │1  2  3  4  5│
> │2  │2  4  6  8 10│
> │3  │3  6  9 12 15│
> │4  │4  8 12 16 20│
> │5  │5 10 15 20 25│
> └───┴─────────────┘
>
> ~ Katrina
>
> On 10/15/21 3:32 AM, Elijah Stone wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Katrina Scialdone wrote:
> >>      <"0&> input ; (parens input) ; (depthOf input)
> > NB. you can remove redundancies here using a fork:
> > <"0&> (] ; parens ; depthOf) input
> >> Its behavior is quite similar to ,[0.5] in Dyalog APL, which was the
> >> inspiration for finding a J equivalent.
> > If your lists are homogenous, you can use ,: instead:
> >     x=. i.5
> >     y=. -x
> >     z=. *:x
> >     w=. -:x
> >     x , y , z ,: w
> > 0   1  2   3  4
> > 0  _1 _2  _3 _4
> > 0   1  4   9 16
> > 0 0.5  1 1.5  2
> > (Whoever thought the axis operator was a good idea, I have no idea... :)
> >> Is this a known technique, and is there a common name for this?
> > I don't know of a specific name for it, but using boxes to format tables
> > is definitely common.
> > The dictionary uses something similar to demonstrate the 'table' adverb
> > (https://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/intro03.htm).
> >   -E
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>


-- 

Devon McCormick, CFA

Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to