On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, Marshall Lochbaum wrote:
Structural Under isn't always compatible with the existing Under.
The other examples you give are arguably mistakes, but here is one which is not: >.
-&.>1 gives <_1; but the same sentence with structural under in place of &. should give _1, retaining the original domain.
-E ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
