I also get 0s on amd ryzen
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022, 03:15:42 p.m. EST, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: I get 0 0 0 0 0 as I expected. What's your CPU? Henry Rich On 2/8/2022 3:07 PM, Hauke Rehr wrote: > As I said, I haven’t been using it much. > Now I just tried > _. = 1 2 _. 4 5 > 1 1 1 1 1 > > … pardon? > > I understand one could answer > 0 0 1 0 0 > or > 0 0 _. 0 0 > or > _. _. 1 _. _. > or (as preferred/proposed by me) > _. _. _. _. _. > but the answer current J gives is totally bogus (to me) > > Agree/disagree? I don’t see a supporting rationale > for this behavior (but again, I don’t have experience > using it – maybe I just don’t know enough about it?) > > > Am 08.02.22 um 20:55 schrieb Hauke Rehr: >> As long as it’s represented by different float values, that is. >> It shouldn’t have been a float to start with in my opinion. >> And I’d say >> _. -: _. >> _. >> in keeping with what I had been writing before. >> >> Am 08.02.22 um 20:52 schrieb Raul Miller: >>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:43 PM Hauke Rehr <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> >>> wrote: >>>> To be honest, I’m a bit confused by the stated difficulty. >>> >>> The mathematical properties of _. (or, generally speaking, >>> indeterminate values) are rather confusing: >>> >>> Since _. is not necessarily equal to _. it's difficult to reason about >>> arrays which contain this "value". >>> >> > -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
