That's fine, but this example can occur unintentionally.

For example, using gcd on a result from a dll call.

-- 
Raul

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:48 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think what happened was, Roger tried to figure out a way to make NaN
> behave well but was unable to do so. In the end, he threw up his hands
> and created NaN error for when we generate a NaN, and let the devil take
> the hindmost if you use one intentionally.  Where he put so much
> thought, I don't expect to find a better solution.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 5/6/2022 3:44 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > The distinction between "undefined" and "NaN" is a distinction of
> > convenience, not a distinction of merit.
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to