Just try adding _. + 4 .
Henry Rich
On 5/6/2022 6:47 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Huh?
My understanding was that the only acceptable sources of _. were:
direct entry, evaluation, 3!:n and DLL calls.
And, that the only primitives which were allowed to produce results
containing _. were structural primitives which move data without
interpreting it.
--
Raul
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:58 PM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
No. _. + 4 is not a NaN error. _ - _ is NsN error.
This result should be _. with no error.
Henry Rich
On 5/6/2022 5:55 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Sure, but that's not prescriptive here.
Here, we have a case where there is no result because _.
(approximately speaking) gives an unhandled infinity as an
unrecognized loop condition.
My gut feeling is that this means that we should treat this as an
example of a case where the result would be _. if we could compute it
(which means that we should throw a NaN error).
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
