contrary to the answer I gave, I agree: the names are actually used already so they had better put on the refcard
And I also agree that some verbs don’t need any explanation. I thought about putting them in groups more like it’s done in NuVoc – otoh, if I want to see those relationships, I can just go there. Which kind of grouping is best for a refcard? Not a question I’d know to answer. Am 04.08.22 um 18:48 schrieb 'robert therriault' via Programming:
d. I think that finding names is often when I would use a quick reference. Many of the other primitives are either explained by mathematical notation or in the description of the result, so all primitives might be overkill (but, if there were space, probably should be included).
-- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
